Cialis and health insurance: discrimination matters | Colombia ...

We should be reasonable in our demand stowards health coverage. It would be impossible for an insurance company to stay in business if you could claim for any and every different type of loss you suffered. So insurers produce lists of the risks insured. Speaking simply, if you fall ill, you can see a physician or go to a hospital for treatment. The real problem, as we can see, is in the definition of illness. If we look at men and the area of reproduction, no politician raises any questions if treatments allow men to have sex without the consequences of children. For example, men are routinely allowed to claim the cost of vasectomies. More generally, almost every health plan in both the public and private sectors pay out for men to pick up erectile dysfunction drugs, vacuum pumps and other similar devices.

At this point, let?s come to the current argument over the rights of employers to deny their employees access to health insurance paying for contraception using hormonal pills and intrauterine devices, sterilization and abortion. A number of religious groups led by the US Conference of Catholic Bishops has been claiming the right to deny any treatment to its employees that it considers immoral. So, regardless of the faith or lack of it among those employed, the employer would be allowed to define the scope of the health insurance according to its own religious beliefs. Well, not surprisingly, all the people who would be penalized by this stance came out in opposition and, after some negotiation, President Obama proposed a grand compromise. Birth control will be available without co-payments on all health plans. Religious organizations with a diverse workforce can opt out, but the insurance companies would be obliged to supply these services free of charge. For the record, the Institute of Medicine treats birth control as a preventive measure, reducing the cost of dealing with unwanted pregnancies, generally improving women?s health, and avoiding abortions.

In fact, 28 states already have contraceptive equity laws. Some people believe this demonstrates the extreme sexism of the Bishop?s opposition. If women are to be denied access to birth control by their employers, why are the Bishops not demanding the same right to control the men? It?s a fact that some employers do supply free Cialis and other PDE5 inhibitors to their male employees. Denying women equal access to birth control treatments is singularly unsubtle discrimination. Oral contraceptives, sterilization and Cialis pills to all who trult requires it should be routine.

ohio state girl with the dragon tattoo fab melo ohio state basketball collateral dick cheney heart umf